/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15826332
>gold is heavier than silver.

right side

>>15296829

wtf professors will shittalk specific students, and specific colleagues behind their backs mercilessly.
>so student K came to my office today to ask about this. he doesn't understand anything. fucking moron.
>yeah I had him in course X, he shouldn't be here at all, poor prof J who's his advisor
>proj J is a fucking loser, fuck him too
is literally a common conversation profs will have when sitting around eating lunch with eachother.

>>15212217

>>15188441
>0 is just another name for the value of no thing,
Which is usefull why?

>0 is the origin number.
It's not of number, it represents "no origin".

>0 is the quantity of noting.
But there's no quantity in nothing and 0 isn't a number.

>0 is defined directly via the additive identity.
Newspeak math? Or original?

>Agreed you were wrong in your original claim
I elaborated it more. I was never wrong, you misunderstood by taking the example too far.

>Yes I have more words that can prove my case where you just find ways to say nu-uh over and over.
Yes. Because this is an argument about nothing, Jerry. We can be as wrong or right as fantasy allows.

>Its true,
How is a medium "nothing"? I though space was a vacuum and the aether didn't exist?

>you can't even come up with words to say otherwise
Why should I come up with more words for nothing? You're way better at it than I'll ever be.

>they still explain by describing.
You "explain" by describing. Description are not explanations.

>Then why was it just the subject of your sentence if it can't me a subject matter of discussion?
I said "not something specific to discuss over".

>Yes you have been discussing nothing because we can
the subject nothing, not the object.

>you were wrong,
How can I be wrong when we're not even talking about something to be wrong about? How can you get "nothing" wrong? Using double negatives?

>it is a valid subject
Heckin' cute too?

>which is how we can discuss it and you can start so many sentence with nothing.
Cool story bro. Carry on with your 400+ reply thread about nothing.

Prove that for n -> ∞
[math](\frac{n}{n+1})^{n^{2}+1} = 0[/math]
Use Bernoulli's inequality.

I dun get it. What is my r and my x (going by EN Wikipedia's notation) here? I can see something having to do with the n+1 in the fraction, but nothing else.

>>11166852
>one gram of diamond weighs something like 20 grams

>>11064389
What? Do they think that FH is still in development or something?

>>11015886
but steel is heavier than fibers