/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11438039
>that doesn’t explain your casimir effect analogy at all. just hand waving
the reason this goes over your head is because you are a little bill nye peon that has not read one thing about ether theory. You only read the approved list of books.
proof me wrong
Oliver Heaviside
Charles Proteus Steinmetz
Oleg D. Jefimenko
any of them?
>>11438083
you explain mass with inertia and inertia with mass. That is called a circular argument.
>infinite or as small as you like.
between 0 and infinite is a non answer.
But you seem scared to give me answers anyway.
I will do you the favor space can only be between objects. from point A to B you measure 1m that is space it is a mental construct and does not exist on it's own.

>>10121912
>very first we saw turning out to be an alien probe is pretty much impossible.
I'd LIKE to agree with you, but until we know how many actual alien colony ships there are out there, you can't gauge what percentage of interstellar objects are spacecraft and what percentage are rocks.
And you think there aren't many genuine spacecraft because you assume almost all are just rocks.

>>9487428
...wait, let me guess:
Assuming this is a simulation, the parent universe must be chock full of societies with that kind of technological ability (don't ask me how I know, I just do).
Therefore, (still under the assumption this is a simulation), simulations must outnumber physical universes (assuming there's only a small number of physical universes, don't ask why).
Therefore I can conclude this is a simulation (assuming it's a simulation).