/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10103891
>Please locate the planets "fat" or any other human organ equivalents that it possesses since comparing the earth and a human body can indicate climate change.
it's real simple, anon. some amount of CO2, just like some amount of body fat, is necessary to sustain the biosphere/human body. there's no set amount that's The Best, because conditions vary, but there's a range of reasonable amounts. however, if you get too much of it too quickly, it causes a bunch of problems unrelated to its sustaining function.
if you can't make sense of that, you have my sympathy for being unable to understand simple analogies.
teal deer: there can be too much of a good thing.

>No, CO2 Lags behind temperature.
not currently.

>I wonder what would happen if you made millions of buildings, filled them with power hungery air conditioners (cold air doesn't come out of the outside unit now does it?) and things that use this magical electricity. Also lets fill every store with neon signs and human beings and get rid all the things that cause shade.
>"no wind"-no circulation, no dissipation, insulation. No way to move the hot air being capacitized by the fucking giant slabs of rock and asphalt.
waste heat from electricity is a small contributor. the UHI effect is driven NOT by the heat given off by machines or humans, but rather by the replacement of soil and plant materials with paved surfaces that retain heat better.
put another way: you could build a city and then abandon it, so that it held no people and drew no power, and it would STILL act as an urban heat island.
>neon signs produce heat
lmao you're retarded.

>>8996194
it's an example of how thoroughly ignorant Creationists are.
meanwhile, they're ignoring all the transitional forms we DO have. are those forms from the exact fork? probably not. but they cover the branches extending between those forks...