/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9753486
>It's dielectric though.
So what if it's dielectric? Earlier iterations of the experiment using conducting wires demonstrated the effect just fine, and modern versions using quartz fibers have returned results consistent with those. If the same results are obtained regardless of whether or not the wires are conducting, it's pretty obvious that the conductivity or insulation of the wires doesn't affect the experiment in any meaningful way.
You are engaging in more of your special pleading because your model falls apart in light of the Cavendish experiment.

>show me how perspective works using a diagram
ezpz

Case 1:
viewer----------------------------------A----------------------------------B
because A is between B and the viewer, it blocks the view of B by intercepting rays of light traveling from B towards the viewer

Case 2:
viewer----------------------------------------------------------------------B
------------------------------------------A
because A is not between B and the viewer, the view to B remains unimpeded. no amount of foreshortening or vanishing point effects can change this.

>>9662334
it's called "crank magnetism"
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_(person)#Crank_magnetism
basically, fool 'em once, you can fool 'em again.