/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15623356
If I may be pedantic, you (or someone in the reply chain) said "at any temperature," and technically there are two zero readings. Whether those could be measurement errors, I don't know. It seems that the erratic nature of the measurements is what indicates a zero resistance "characteristic"

>Fig. 3(a) shows the temperature dependence of resistance sample S1, with a clear zero resistance characteristic observed at 110 K,
indicating the possibility of superconductivity
>It is worth noting that some other pieces exhibit semiconductor behavior, consistent with the literature
>indicating that the superconducting volume fraction of the sample may be very small

To be clear, I'm not arguing for or against the existence of superconductivity, just highlighting what the authors of the study said.