/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12500238
t.

>>11374240

>>11366753

>>10904228
>as is indicated in every piece of evidence we have ever measured and every piece of technology we have ever built
Exploitable similarities and repititions of features in natural phenomena do not prove the existence of your magic retard code idea. Sorry little buddy. You haven't shown any reason to believe there needs to be some "code" forcing nature to have recurring instances of self-similarity. It's much more reasonable if you have to assume anything to guess it's the other way around and the rules we abstract out were derived from useful recurring similarities nature happens to have been engaging in, in our little area of observable space, in our little history of documented time. Not that different from how we've historically happened upon natural resources like precious metals or oil. It doesn't need to be some code making natural resources that are useful happen to exist nearby where we exist and it doesn't need to be some code making natural instances of recurring self-similarity from happening to exist, for the time being, in the domain we operate inside.
Here's further reading:
https://www.google.com/search?&q=induction+problem+hume