/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9070630

What you're suggesting goes against current medical ethics. Operations necessarily include risks (short term and long term). One of the pillars of medical ethics is "doing no harm". In order to go ahead with surgery, especially a pretty invasive one like what you mentioned, the potential benefits should outweigh the potential harms. In this case the potential harms are clear but there are no potential benefits other than satisfying your curiosity. Most surgeons would therefore refuse to perform it. The only ones who might accept would be money obsessed cunts or sickos.

That said, if you actually need programmed surgery, you might be able to ask the anesthesiologist to stay awake. Seeing stuff wouldn't be very likely and touching is out of the picture (assepsia and surgeon butthurt over touching the surgical field).