/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11363981
Quiet globecuck, the real scientists are posting now.

>>11311743
Globecucks absolutely BTFO.

>>11287231
Yep.

The official thread for flat earth scientists and intellectuals to share and discuss flat earth science.

Oblate spheroidians are permitted to post in here, but only those who are not triggered, screeching autists who add nothing to the intelligent discourse. We have no time for children.

A basic philosophical understanding of science, metaphysics and epistemology is highly recommended before challenging flat earth, else your arguments will almost always be foundationally fallacious.

Let the thread commence!

>>11168209
> The Earth is round.

>>10222484

>>9987344
>thinking that's "globe curvature"

>How high up is that?
I don't recall, but this one is about 124,000ft up.

>>9811435
The Big Bang Theory is nonsense so don't bother with that.

Split the class into two, ask one side to try and prove the earth is a globe with practical experiments, ask the other side to try and prove the earth is flat with practical experiments.

Post your flat earth evidences here. Autistic globe rage is not tolerated.

>>9753545
>>9753547
See >>9753565

>>9753551
How much time is actually spent trying to prove current theories wrong, rather than trying to prove them right (and failing)?

Science should be independent to what the majority believes, its primary aim is to be independent of it. I had no issue believing the globe model for most of my life because I assumed that science was independent of dogmatic belief, I trusted it without personal verification or free, critical thought. If you criticise mainstream scientific theories you will not pass your exams, you have to go along with it.

>>9750737
A local sun that's not setting behind globe curvature.

>oh wait, turns out when you do take high-altitude footage using a lens with no distortion, you actually can see the curvature of the earth.
Kek, notice how the horizon line is suspiciously at the top of the frame? All lenses have curvature, and they will curve more at the top and bottom, but if the horizon is in the middle of the frame, it's completely flat. Try again.

>the apparent height of a far-off hurdle might be smaller, but so will the height of the "distortion layer"
Not the height of the distortion layer in front of the far-off hurdle.

>>9727286
Sure kid.