/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14666154
5000 genetic diseases, that doesn't make sense to have as such fucked up species naturally.
The fact humans have an very specific gene to worship this species.
around 40 genetic illenesses that will kill you (inb4 the malaria meme answer, no, doesn't make sense to have so many)
a fused chromosome.
Psychological NPC and slave caste traits in most of humanity.

Besides the archeological evidence in folklore of some alien race creator in fucking sculptures of ancient sumerian era civilizations.

>>14666175
There's much older civilizations that humans.
Humans were made from the annunaki gods who create us in very specific biomes around the world where each major human race originated.

>Americans

My cock rn

Why I always end up at discussing philosophy when I go to the deepest core of any discussion?

Seems like everything, once you go deep enough is philosophical in nature.

How do u define the value of a work of art in economic terms?

It contradict both the marxist theory of labour and both the austrian denition of supply and demand.

A piece of art takes more effort to a begginer than the same time when he's a master.
It took me 2 days to make crappy drawing when today I can make a much better drawing in 5 minutes.

So over time, the effort I put into a drawing should less, since is easier to me now.
So by this logic the price of my drawings should be lower, since they take less time and effort to make.
But in reality the older I become, the higher I could charge for them.

Also, the austrian supply and demand doesn't work either.
That would imply that pop radio trash has higher value than a more avant garde piece of jazz, because the demand is higher, then their value should be higher.
But this would mean that shades of gray has an infinite value compared to more skilled writers that are only known in academia, like Lord byron or chaucer.

It's absurd to pretend the demand of a product determines it's economic price.
What value has demand of the product over it's aesthetical value.

It's absurd to think that demand determines the aesthetical value of a product, even if my crappy drawings I made when I was a begginer has less value under the marxist theory than modern drawings of mine, and they have less value under the supply and demand argument, they still have infinite personal value to me and I would never sell them, at any price, while I could easily sell a better drawing I can make today by a lot more price, but the newer drawing has less personal value to me than the older one, even if It has less demand from customers and I see it as a worse drawing than the modern ones.

Which is a contradiction of both definitions.

How are we able to commit suicide? Isn't that supposed to be against our biology?

What's the name of the methodology wildberger uses to teach math.

It's not what I was taught math nor is like the other math videos or courses I see.

He's more like what you read on euclides.

Is wildberger a more classical teacher in math than most other math educators today?

>Download a linear algebra course
>It's all gay shit I already know from using godot

>Matrix operations
>Same shit as dealing with the transform matrix of godot
>Tuples
>It's the same shit as a list in coding

Linear algebra is a meme, same as math.

>>11441450
Story of my life

Has any /sci/ autist done any analizing of how contagious is resident evil virus if It was an IRL virus?