/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14674988

>>14648552
>Killed by ullage collapse from fuel slosh in the header tank

>>12792508

Out of all the three launches so far, SN8 still looks the best because of the absolute clear weather that day.

>>12656581
>>12656730
If you want to really screw with your brain, think of the first few seconds as footage in space, that's the blue Earth ocean below

>>12642440
Just progressing starship testing would do it.

>>12638870
yes

>>12583004

Anon... SN8 nailed the entire maneuver, it worked nearly flawlessly. If the engines have gotten their fuel, it would have landed.

>>12581445
>>12581594
You are a retard.
/sfg/ is a rolling general here that covers every detail of SpaceX's Starship development. Look at the catalogue and find it.

But to spoonfeed: Starhopper was just a water tower, it flew once and has been retired. The SN prototypes are what you're thinking of, SN5 and SN6 hopped last year, and SN8 flew really high in November nearly sticking the landing but exploding on impact. SN9 is set to do the same but right this time within the next few days, yesterday it had three static-fires of its engines in a row which is real good.
Also SN10 and SN11 are pretty much ready to go, with bits of further prototypes well into construction.

>>12522803
Jesus christ man, just reading all your posts in the thread is making me laugh uncontrollably. The common typos, the libterturdianism, the shart sniffing and fedora tipping is off the charts. Thank christ your genes are never getting to space.

>>12502909
Starship ODST marines/navy seals when?

>>12497046
Soon brother

2nd for skydiving Starship.

This shit is so cool

old
>>12444204

SN9 flight when?

New angle from SpaceX