/sci/ - Science & Math

Reminder that Science is a white field and indians and blacks should leave

Literally get out. Science is a white field, and you proped up wannabe diversity negroids are diluting the quality here.

[math] \text{ Is there a fucking list detailing which mathjax commands are legal on /sci/? If there isn't, I'm gonna make one for you guys. }
\\ \text{ Also, are there any permissions I must obtain before I can add stuff like that to our wiki? } [/math]

its been a while since I've seen a ylyl thread

>>9737556

>>9642456
>math/physics major
>getting a job in automotive
Lol good luck

you are studying for your finals, right?

>>9354903
>An opinion about acquiring a PhD doesn't require scientific evidence.
Ah, so you admit that your claims aren't actually based in any sort of evidence.
>It takes a lot of effort swimming in other people's bullshit, as well as creating you're own.
Again, you know this how? You keep making bold proclamations about things that, by your own admission, you have no firsthand knowledge of.
>You experience a physical object first hand, but beyond that it's just using other people's ideas to analyse such things.
So is your beef with recorded knowledge itself, then? I knew your lot was ignorant, but you are literally arguing against the existence of books.
>All of them because they're not physical objects.
"1+1=2 is anti-science!"
--(You)
>Not an argument.
Not an argument.
>pic attached shows deliberate warping to make the earth appear more curved/spherical
...you're surprised that heavily foreshortened objects near the camera, especially those towards the side of its FOV, are distorted? you can test this yourself with a camera and a stick in your own back yard.

Every time you post, it can be summed up as "I don't know anything about what I'm talking about, and I refuse to find out!"

they all did it.

1. If a conjecture is strong enough does proving it provide any practical benefits?

2. Have any conjectures that we thought was true turn out to be false?

3. How valid are proof by contradictions? How does starting with a premise that X is not Y and then ending up with sheningans a valid proof that X is Y? Why is it ok to do that you can't start your proof of with X = Y when trying to prove X = Y and then using algebra and other math to work X or Y into Y or X.

Is Calculus 2 really such a difficult subject? My class started with 35 students and now there are only 9 students

I assume most of /sci/ is still in undergrad or maybe grad school. What's your thoughts on people cheating/reporting cheaters?

I've reported two this year already. It makes me feel like a dick but I don't think it's right to have someone get higher grades because they are using a phone or paper with all the answers on it. Plus everyone is competing for scholarships and internships so why let someone get a leg up that way?

picture unrelated

>>9139740

well?....

let me see your calculators nerds.

>tee hee im not good at le maths! xDDD
>so now i wont try at it just to confirm my belief that im not good and get stuck in a cycle of idiocy!
Just morons being morons and not trying so they can brag about being bad at something they didnt try at. Its like when people brag about bad grades to validate themselves.

Memes aside, I use the fx-9750GII.

>>8469245
The issue with speculating about orbital or lunar construction is our current inability to lift heavy cargo further than the ISS without using unidirectional (non-returning) spacecraft. If we can economise our fuel sources and create an International Space Launch System then it would be less of a hassle to begin the design on necessary infrastructure.
Heavy Scientific Industry ultimately depends on the available workforce and their happiness; sure you can contract a workforce of engineers and chemists to conduct minor fabrication in a sub-surface lunar complex, but without the aforementioned ISLS to facilitate supply and build the SLC initially there is no chance of reducing the cost for further space exploration.
Indeed, lowering the cost of escaping gravity is the single most daunting task facing Humanity reaching further into the void.

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \psi (x) * \frac{d}{dx} \psi(x) = 0$. Why is this? I know you can't actually cancel the dx terms.

>>8440549
Cool, thanks for the input man. I really appreciate it. Im just super lost right now I feel (not really) but yeah.

>>8422211
wrong
Left side and right side of ther arrow are NOT identical - you can't just mirror the thing without changing your result to the opposite. So in your case your right side is S therefor left side is R

What are some decent websites such as Khan Academy that offer math and science help?

>>8332271
>mathematics
>tiny Catholic school in midwest
>35
Cornell and Dartmouth rejected me, those bastards