/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11363358
>No one said that. The SLS has already been designed before the project even started.
??? English pls.
>No one who actually pays attention to US politics said that. The SLS has been written into law by the Senate, it would require a massive shift in politcal winds before SLS would get canceled before it was built.
Tell that to the idiots who screeched about that for years
>Clipper was soft-booted off SLS
Might happen. Hasn't yet. Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
>because the launch rate is so low.
Weren't you just saying Congress determines what happens to SLS? Because Congress wants SLS to launch more, and they current bill directs NASA to reactivate High Bay 1 of the VAB for dual-launch architectures.
>For the price of 1 SLS launch, over 22 Falcon Heavy launches could be purchased.
Nice graphic. How do you like mine?
(They're both wrong, by the way.)