/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11893394
>>11893422

>This was the reason why Asclepius and his sons practised no such art. They were acting in the interest of the public, and did not wish to preserve useless lives, or raise up a puny offspring to wretched sires. Honest diseases they honestly Jowett1892: 408cured; and if a man was wounded, they applied the proper remedies, and then let him eat and drink what he liked. But [xlvi] they declined to treat intemperate and worthless subjects, even though they might have made large fortunes out of them. As to the story of Pindar, that Asclepius was slain by a thunderbolt for restoring a rich man to life, that is a lie—following our old rule we must say either that he did not take bribes, or that he was not the son of a god.

>Not treating degenerates from diseases they wrought upon themselves through their non-virtuous lifestyle
>their own problems
>not helping them
>this is eugenics?

How is that eugenics?