[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11288574 [View]
File: 36 KB, 848x203, energy more certain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11288574

>>11288571

But entangled quantum systems have their own resetable histories as well. Breaking T-symmetry just shows that one dimensional time can be bidirectional, but is limited by its relative higher dimensional history. Also that 3 dimensional time an asymptote at time = 0 just as things can be cooled to negative kelvin without actually reaching absolute zero, instead having a latent heat phase. Big bang and 3 dimensional time ≈ positive kelvin temperatures that can slow down but only increase unidirectionally. And second dimensional time can be dilated slower relative to a nonaccelerating observers, but never faster than a certain speed in the same inertial frame of reference we perceive as the speed of time. Using second time dimensional events for reference, our biology tuned our minds to best utilize to meter perceived time against. Second dimension of time is time as you know it and usually what we plug into X in a function.

As you can see in my attached OC, time is totally 4 dimensional until you start inventing fractal or abstract dimensions for the sake of simulations in pseudo phase space like a video game upon nonphysical dimensions must be 'represented' like a fictitious book that obeys the author's rules, but of course it may be apparent in a novel that those rules are still superceded by what we call the physical world.

I can explain 4 dimensional time, but I still need to adjust below as it still applies only to EM. Aka, its not rigorous enough yet to apply to all massless field particles.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]