/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12571720
>laughs in [math]\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}[/math]| nyaa> + [math]\frac{i}{\sqrt 2}[/math] |meow>

>>11364474
Not doing your homework friendo

>>10475909

>>10159625
>yes, assclown, we do lots of experiments in a science curriculum

Not sure if underage or soft science major.

Hi /sci/
I'm studying both economics (focus on macro) and physics, and next semester it'll be time to write my bachelor thesis in economics.
Do you have suggestions on what topic I could choose to put my (compared to other economics students) vast math knowledge acquired in physics to use?

m

Is Gen Biology worth learning?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5EPymcWp-g
Explain yourselves

>>7097614
>biology

>>6454895
Chemistry books don't need any fucking biology knowledge to read dumbass. Organic books might say "This compound found in the retina undergoes so and so reaction after exposure to UV thousands of times per second" only as example of such reactions and you don't need to understand/know any biological aspects of it.

Also, biology is a completely worthless and unscientific field you shouldn't be wasting your life reading.

>>6240176

>>5898892
>Computer science relies heavily on math

It absolutely does not

>Biology is science then you really need to stop being a close minded idiot.

It's just one unfounded assumption upon another. There are only a handful of actual biological physicist rigorously studying the subject and trying to turn it into a legitimate field. Biology is going to stay being tad more than blatant witch-doctoring for many decades to come.

Physics.

If I try to learn other sciences like chemistry I naturally tend to keep wanting answers to more fundamental questions. Like where do the orbitals come from, etc.. and I can't deal with just using that result without studying where it came from.

physics seems to be the only science that can give this to me.

May not have much to do with skin color, but more with morphology.

.Child-like features tend to invoke protective responses
.Child-like features tend to inhibit defensive responses
.Relative size of frame relates to the two factors above
.Smaller, slender features suggest that the subject is not already pregnant
.Secondary sexual features may be relatively enhanced by comparison of size in a person with the frame size mentioned above
.For example, the idea of a "slender woman with large breasts" may be more sexually appealing than a "large-boned woman with (relatively) small breasts"
.Larger frame also equates with certain masculine features which is sexually inhibitive unless there is an attraction to masculine features (homoerotic preferences)
.Facial masculine features which would signify that the subject is a male would be less prevalent in a smaller-framed female that is lightly-boned and who may have more child-like, feminine features

There are many "black" women who are small-boned, petite, and have child like features. I don't think it has to do with race, although there are some black women that are large-framed and have strong physical features suggesting a masculine development. Likewise, there are "white" women with masculine features (longer nose, gaunt facial features, large-framed/obese).

Cultural conventions obviously also affect this perception of attractiveness, especially as it regards skin coloration. But I agree that there are universally attractive feminine features that certain Asian females have more than their share of. And thanks for the very hot photo.

Hey everybody! My girlfriend moved into an apartment with shared internet and so internet here is painfully slow (we're talking four hours to download an episode of breaking bad). Anyone know how I can nab more of the bandwidth?

>>4875341

old shit, new fags. if you didn't read the article, this is basically what it says. The God particle is a subatomic atom, the smallest atom. We discovered it last Tuesday while observing sheep fucking in front of a telescope. The only way to use the god particle is to rape the nearest sheep and post a picture in this thread.

>>4811806
lel

Why do physicists make fun of biologists

>>4387206