/sci/ - Science & Math

>Quantum physics tells us that

>>11037152

Don't worry, most of the psych graduates I know say that MBTI is equivalent of Astrology but I don't think they would like to know how retarded is to even consider such statement. It's the same phenomena I observe in atheists (and my former atheist me, I am agnostic). Atheists think of themselves as the supreme elite of knowledge and truth but their confidence is only fuelled by their own ignorance. Anyone who takes himself seriously enough will eventually realize that atheism is the same as gnosticism or even worse. Because philosophy does not exist in their dictionary I suppose.

So yes, the MBTI is REALLY good, not the MBTI in itself but the theoretical framework that behind its foundations, the Jungian functions from Carl Jung.

I agree entirely with the statement that MBTI is not science, the test are not good and reliable enough if compared with the big five traits (OCEAN) for example. But it's easy to translate from ocean to MBTI if you are not brain-dead so... Even while the OCEAN is more "scientific" than the MBTI / jungian functions the difference of depth for understanding human personality and psyche that the Jungian framework offers in contraposition to ocean is just massive.

Both of them are good for certain uses but nowadays the best way to understand the human personality is with the Jungian framework with no shadow of doubt. Its not scientific but it does not need it to, unluckily this appears to be too much to deal with for the average scientific brainlet who takes and believes in science in a blind and dogmatic way without even realizing it. Just thinking about some of those who I know makes me sick, what a sad way to taint the beauty of the scientific method...

What type are you? I guess from your answer you could be INTJ/INTP.