/sci/ - Science & Math

>One of the most influential mathematicians of all time.
>Proves the existence of God.

>the thoughts start again
>going insane
>haven’t been the same after my sports head injury
>remember Gödel
>only think Gödel thoughts
>everything is okay
>cam down
Thank you Gödel. Saved my life.

I've always had this hunch it may be the solution to unsolved mathematical problems such as the millennium prize problems

Can someone explain Gödel's incompleteness theorem and Turing's halting problem undecidability proof in different terms or with some simple analogies? Every time I feel like I might understand them, I later realize I don't really think I do.

>>11710674
>All of existence could be explained
Godel says no.

>HaHa look at me le epic logic man ,duuude this weird convoluted self referential statement cannot be prove, Math is like incomplete and shit Hhah duuude weeed.

please explain

>>11239226
They don't

>>11234120
>uh ok...lets see E=mc^2 plus ht remainder of-- OOOOOOOWWWWW OOOOHHHHH OOOOOOW WHAT THE HELL

>>11208481
>>Philosophy is thinking without rigor. Math is rigor without thinking. Science is both
This fucking pissed me off so bad. so fucking ignorant.
why is it that scifags just MUST shit on every single field possible.
Pure mathematics requires lots of thinking and creativity, the rigor is just there because it would be fucking incoherent without it.

so when are going to start OP?

Did he think they needed axiomatization?

>>11173272
based Cedric Villani poster

just a reminder this has nothing to do with math or science.

>>11052468

>>11053018
based Perelman
>>11053037
>your undergraduate school isnt a huge factor
it isn't if you're not white
;^)
>>11053046
Yikesers really goes to show what kind of retards they admit at Cambridge
>>11053416
>mastering calc
lol
>15
bro imagine not having an undergraduate understanding of math at the age of 13.
>HURR DURR I SPENT 12 YEARS LEARNING ARITHMETIC
>straight A
imagine not turning in your homework
>>11053449
this but unironically.
I don't know if I wouldn't have gotten into an ivy league school because I only applied to one school, my state school, simply because it was one 10-5 minute bus ride away.
I never cared about where I went for undergrad.
and when it comes to top graduate programs the intelligence requirements just go through the fucking roof.

>>11053606
me, a geometer: nigga do what you please but don't attach my fucking field to it.
It's SET now not STEM, fuck you cringe engie fags, soft science whores, and tech S"oye" drinkers
[math]R^n[/math]efined men as myself refuse such an association.
M has now freed itself from you inane whores. good bye, you won't be missed.
>>11053689
>you certainly don't do real math.
incredibly based
most scienshits don't even know what real math is.
>>11053722
they don't give a shit, they think nothing exists beyond calculus, and don't know calculus.
>>11053730
DANGEROUSLY BASED AND REDPILLED
>>11053749
We're all part of philosophy my brother.

>>11050569
legal reasons and lack of proper equipment.
>>11050580
TIP KEK
>>11050766
based
>>11050779
They are hysterical. They think a perfect and satisfying answer must be simple and accessible.
>>11051167
actually kind of based
>>11051824
proof?

>>11050929
mega fag at the end. worthless first two. Is that the gravity nigga? get that fool outta there twenty other mathematicians have rights to fathering calculus. Some already listed.
What a shitty list, there is so much fucked up I can't even be bothered to pretend this is a list of Immortals of maths.

> Haaha duude look this mathematical phrase that has no value cannot be proved haha dude I'm le epic logic man , i rehashed ancient philosophical paradoxes but made them hard to understand haha duude weed

Why do we like him again ?

>>11015995
>I disagree
I don't care for your opinion.
show me your proof, then.

>>11012501
make an AGI system, made using logic in this universe.
cannot think outside of said logic because it exceeds the bounds of the universe.
the simulation could have been programed with only the necessary requirements (I'm not including a purpose for the simulation that would be retarded to even being to consider), meaning that outside of our simulated universe could exist rules that are not in our set, or more generally the rules of our universe are a proper subset to those in the non simulated.
however this was a logical conclusion based off logic of whats in our universe so that could mean that it doesn't apply outside if there exists logic not found here. and that would, and that would, and that would, ad infinitum.
let's just say one this is true: that there are two sets of logic where on is the proper sub set to the other. Let's see what we can know about that type of relationship only from our position as a trapped observer to the contained set.
Anyways my main point is that the simulation theory is way too common, it's thought up by things we discovered and ideas we contain, it's pretty retarded. The simulation idea makes way too many assumptions and isn't based on much except for "muh computers".

>another incomplete thread

>>10990351
>another incomplete thread