/sci/ - Science & Math

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840 'Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?'
>Studies find that darker pigmented people avg. higher levels of aggression and sexual activity and lower IQ.

Human intelligence up to 75% inheritable
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html

Human intelligence is highly heritable.
http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households.
http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

The avg. African IQ is estimated at 79.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The avg. African-American IQ is 85 compared to the avg. White IQ of 100. IQ tests are not racially biased. IQ hereditability is 40-80%.
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf

Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636

Intelligence has at least a 40-50% genetic basis.
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

The Black-White IQ gap is mostly genetic.
http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf

IQ is 75% heritable among whites.
https://files.osf.io/v1/resources/8a8jk/providers/osfstorage/58af3d929ad5a10200a40c05?action=download&version=1&direct

IQ is about 80% heritable.
https://archive.is/FTRTu

France's IQ drops 4 points per decade because of African immigration
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615001221

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000852
>Mongoloids are the most K evolved, Caucasoids less, and Negroids the least.

>>10214267

I don't go on /pol/, but you would probably call me /pol/ because I believe some races are inferior to others and Jews are indeed conspiring to retain and expand their ill gotten power. /pol/ would also probably call me tumblr because I'm a communist.

I obtained these viewpoints because I, as an ultraliberal teenager several years ahead of the SJW movement even materializing, looked at the science and data and realized I was wrong. Black people really are inferior. Jews really do run the world. These are facts.

>>10113427

>>9703725

You ain't getting work as an immigrant in the US unless you

>learn english
>already have job skills

Two things that favor high IQ. Sorry OP if your a nig, but this doesn't prove that you can be as smart as whitey. It's the bell curve distribution in action. There are high IQ individuals in all groups, with the number of higher IQ individuals being greater in some groups than others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

Why is this shit so controversial? The heritability of IQ is 0.75, so most of the variation in the population is due to genetic differences. The heritability of height is 0.80. No one tries to say that basket ball players are tall because of their environment. Adoption studies also prove that the differences between racial group are due to genetic differences, yet no one accepts this. I guess this isn't surprising given that something like half of Americans believe in creationism, but why do so many educated Americans believe in the lie of egalitarianism and the blank slate?

What's the consensus on how much of the difference is caused by genes and how much is caused by environment?

>inb4 /pol/
Those retards won't give you a good answer, and this is not really political, even though some political implications may exist to some extent.

Why is analysis so boring?

Literally just fucking google "Race IQ studies" here's the very first result.

These faggots who think people need to be babied about their genetics and scientific facts ignored are the worst kind of suppressed racists.

>>7476145
I can see why a stormfaggot like you would think so. The trick is to be sincere whilst seeming insincere.

For example, you truly appear to be mentally challenged, I just phrased it in a way which gave you space to pretend you were being retarded (instead of actually being retarded, which you would know... if you weren't so retarded) :^)

It's a common problem among us inferior whites. Just wait until the master race east asians put us in place, China will over take US GDP soon, and rival it in military expenditure

>pic related, east asian IQ dominance

>>7443488
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661305002305

There is recent evidence that perceptual processes are influenced by culture.

Obviously since East Asians are more intelligent; those raised in an Asian culture, and those adopted and raised outside of an Asian culture. We can assume that their combination of genetics flourishes in inferior environments (such as the West), but that their culture which shaped sexual selection and other types of cultural propagation of the most intelligent is the better culture of East and West.

> Pic related.

What can they take from the West? Except how to run a culture into the ground?

>>7442233

>>7314874
You're literally in a thread with people who think that black people aren't actually human beings. You don't think Poe's law applies here even more than usual?