/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12770861
Its about power.

What happened to this project /sci/?
It sounded so promising when they announced it 10 years ago

https://web.archive.org/web/20110301043745fw_/http://operatorchan.org/n/
https://www.bloomberg.com/businessweek/ap/financialnews/D9LL7OSO0.htm
>A Massachusetts biotechnology company says it can produce the fuel that runs Jaguars and jet engines using the same ingredients that make grass grow.

>Joule Unlimited has invented a genetically-engineered organism that it says simply secretes diesel fuel or ethanol wherever it finds sunlight, water and carbon dioxide.

>The Cambridge, Mass.-based company says it can manipulate the organism to produce the renewable fuels on demand at unprecedented rates, and can do it in facilities large and small at costs comparable to the cheapest fossil fuels.

>What can it mean? No less than "energy independence," Joule's web site tells the world, even if the world's not quite convinced.

>"We make some lofty claims, all of which we believe, all which we've validated, all of which we've shown to investors," said Joule chief executive Bill Sims.

>"If we're half right, this revolutionizes the world's largest industry, which is the oil and gas industry," he said. "And if we're right, there's no reason why this technology can't change the world."

>The doing, though, isn't quite done, and there's skepticism Joule can live up to its promises.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

is global warming real or is it just a big government hoax life the coronavirus epidemic?

Yesterday the thermometer at my home said that the high temperature was 85ºF, but the government weather service in my town said it was 94ºF. The day before that my house was 88ºF and the government weather service said it was 97ºF
Can science explain this or is it reasonable to believe that the government is exaggerating high temperatures to forward the soience extremist global warming mythology?

>>11918095

i find it astounding that science was able to accurately predict the current chimpout more than 16 years ago. how do they do that?

>>11805838
>They are using the robes of science to deliberately mislead and scare the public.
all scientists do that, its very deliberate

>>11617253
>If you were interested in the unabridged science, you would read the primary publications.
who gives a shit what unabridged science has to say? unabridged science doesn't affect public discourse or public policy. one instagram post by gretchen thunderburp has more impact on public policy than the average professional scientist's entire career.

>>11473877
atheists can't do science because atheists don't believe that dishonesty is fundamentally immoral, atheists are willing to bend the truth whenever it pleases them.

>>11396459
check the mainstream media sources that convinced you climate change was real to begin with, they're certain to be full of accurate scientific information which predicts the future with peer reviewed academic consensus precision