/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16012715
What's the point of this company? Everyone is making their own engines nowadays.

Is [math]\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}[/math] isomorphic to [math](\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z})^\times[/math]?

>>11700517
Why would anyone go to /g/?

>>11564280
>tranny
Why the transphobia?
t. different anon

What notetaking program does /sci/ use to store their notes?

>>9089324
>free group over natural numbers

>>9070359
>jordanized

>>9065737
>Bush didn't ban stem cell research
Did I say he did? Why the strawman?

>>9064085
>>Doesnt belong in /sci/

>>9061088
>I'm always annoyed when people define the Zeta function like that

If evolution is true, why would humans have evolved to naturally believe in religious superstitions?

>>9015075
>not a single major averages under 100 IQ

What does the consistency/hardness of your nose mucus imply?

>>9006460
>a math problem is a meme if you can't solve it

>>9003834
>Assignments in your final year should really only be to see how you're doing.
So what are you getting a grade based on then if it's not assignments?

>>8993374
problem?

>>8989401
is that you on the left or you on the right?

>>8989022
Didn't that paper get torn apart on stackexchange? I can't understand the fine details but it sounds like it was very overhyped/possibly contained some errors

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2211278/riemann-hypothesis-is-bender-brody-m%C3%BCller-hamiltonian-a-new-line-of-attack

>In conclusion, the sloppyness of the definitions used but the authors leads to a complete mess. Nothing is correct in this paper.

>>8988477
dawg it's literally the most natural ordering you can think of, just try writing out some adjacency matrices for small bipartite graphs

>>8986359
>falling this hard for bait

>"string" theory
>pretending CY3's have some place in reality

>>8963760
>Unfortunately you got baited into admitting you're an avatarfag
which post was that in?

>mfw armchair scientists think they know more than the President of the United States and his team of experts, and that they should be making the decisions themselves

>>8909249
>multiple people posting several different images of some guy for over a year
>""forcing a meme""
there has to be some image at the top brainlet, what would you prefer?