/sci/ - Science & Math

They say high IQ but lower than 2 standard deviations is good for leadership.
But is this really the case?
Has anyone compared the IQ of most CEOs and leaders?

Low is best for being CEO
Damn guys. That means high IQ btfo
Since CEOs are everything

>>9824595
In this scenario IQ is not a predictor of success. Something must exist where IQ fails.

>>9822306 >>9823794
128 IQ or above is bad for leadership
>>9823835

http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/why-highly-intelligent-people-make-the-worst-leaders

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/being-too-intelligent-can-make-you-a-less-effective-leader/

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/most-intelligent-people-worse-leaders-study-university-lausanne-iq-a8055846.html

https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/11/13/very-intelligent-people-make-less-effective-leaders-according-to-their-peers-and-subordinates/

https://www.zmescience.com/science/psychology-science/smart-leaders-poor-leaders-0432432/

https://www.inc.com/marcel-schwantes/a-new-study-reveals-1-surprising-fact-about-leaders-with-high-iq.html

How is this possible?
You guys told me emotional intelligence means nothing and only hard basic IQ is the truth in the universe.
What could be the reason for this?
Where is the sweetspot for leadership then?