/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12051516
>Why are you using organic prices?
Because that's the point that I'm trying to make, that food which doesn't rely on advances in chemistry to bring down its price, along with the companies and facilities needed to make it a feasible product for the lower class, scales with not only inflation but also with population count and their demand. A society that cannot produce junk food for its lower classes will shortly collapse or have these lower classes starve to death. So therefor, the government must turn a blind eye to this issue and greenlight affordable junk food, even if it's proven that it's bad for us. Governments that didn't do this, like the Soviet Union, no longer exist and the transitional government to capitalism proved how unaffordable these foods actually were. This is in response to this post's pic >>12050724 laughing at someone on keto for claiming this. Have the FDA ban any form of a chemical with a proven adverse effects that is used by all these multi-billion corporations, and the organic Big Mac would become $15 overnight.