/sci/ - Science & Math

If the world was orderly and decent, with most of it a nature reserve, and only a small part of it populated, it could support up to 100 billion people, relatively sparsely populated (compared to some contemporary cities).
I did the calculations myself. Space, energy, production, food, water, that sort of thing. Didn't do pollution, went for a techy context.

Unclamp.

What's the problem

why don't you guys know anything about the bio's, scientifically - speaking?

Circumclampifluoraccimirradicimination. Scientifically speaking, that is.

>>12253083
>samefag
Clamped.

>>12116903
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma

Or more simply put, if you ask why and try to keep asking why you'll arrive at one of the following:
-Axiomatic (simply is, irreducible)
-Circular (logic forms closed loops which refer to themselves)
-Infinite (endless chain of whys)

"Consciousness", empirically, is the second. You cannot prove the mind (senses) without using the mind. In self or other.