/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9402280
I'm not familiar with quantum computation so I can't pass judgement on that specific paper, but I generally dislike how they proceed from Hilbert spaces and build up representations of the quantum algebras instead of [math]\mathbb{C}^*[/math]-algebras themselves, but that's just me. This looks like a fine survey for understanding the difference between quantum and classical probability but not the actual foundation of quantum mechanics. His axiom 5 seems much stronger than the cyclicity of the vacuum, for example.