/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11362662
...or maybe this?

>>11328829

>The bill would direct NASA to have “full ownership” of a lunar lander rather than buy services from companies.

>Moreover, the bill directs NASA to develop a human lunar lander “as an integrated lunar landing system carried on an Exploration Upper Stage-enhanced Space Launch System,” known as SLS Block 1B.

>“Lunar in-situ resource utilization shall not be considered as risk reduction for the initial crewed missions to orbit and land on Mars,” the bill states. Such activities “shall not be included in the Moon to Mars Program and shall be budgeted separately from the Moon to Mars Program.” The bill similarly restricts any development of a “continuously crewed lunar outpost or research station.”


https://spacenews.com/house-introduces-nasa-authorization-bill-that-emphasizes-mars-over-moon/

tl;dr: no commercial landers, no lunar base on the surface, no lunar ISRU, Gateway still exists and is just renamed to "Gateway to Mars"

Artemis lander edition

Previous thread:
>>11115864