[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.12695088 [View]
File: 125 KB, 680x501, 501.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12695088

>>12695056
Go to the gas chamber already

>> No.12302747 [View]
File: 125 KB, 680x501, 501.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12302747

>>12292080
>We believe in correct spelling too.

>> No.11631515 [View]
File: 125 KB, 680x501, 501.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11631515

>>11631475

>> No.10933476 [View]
File: 125 KB, 680x501, smuggies typo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10933476

>>10933362

>> No.10612728 [View]
File: 125 KB, 680x501, 501.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10612728

>>10612483
>>10612499

>> No.9830106 [View]
File: 125 KB, 680x501, typo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9830106

>>9830098
I feel like you're being delibrately obtuse. I said any because I don't have the rigorous set-theoretic backround to give a good answer. It depends what "universe" you are working in, but I thought it was clear enough for an informal discussion. The wikipedia definition seems good to me.
>But anyway, "This notion cannot be expressed as a formula in the language of set theory.", so you can't even describe what exactly a real number is anyway.
That's not what it is saying. It's saying you can't describe what it means to be describable.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]