/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12537474
>>12537410
1Hydrogen has a lot of repulsive force
You need 4H to create Helium
Simple addition says that they have a combined atomic mass of 4.032
But He is 4.002602 u

0.029398 mass is missing. This is because Hydrogen is 1 proton + 1neutron. Proton is lighter than neutron but has a lot of repulsive force whereas the neutron does not repel

Helium is 2 proton 2 neutron.
When 4 protons get fused, the repulsive forces from protons is enough to turn 2 protons into neutron. Because E=mc^2, energy is mass and can convert the repulsive force into added mass to convert the proton into neutron. The instability of the isotope becomes stable by release what makes it unstable
The process end up converting the repulsion into thermal and vibrational energy

You can make this process more efficient by using deuterium (hydrogen with 1 neutron) or tritium (2 neutrons)
In this case, entire neutrons can get repeled at high velocity

>>11778398
Low IQ people survive through instict
High IQ people survive through sheer intellect
Albeit different, they both have the same result

Mid-levels have enough intellect to figure out the flaws in society but does not have enough to understand why it exists and why it must exist. They are always the ones who says "Change and Revolution" yet does nothing else

Contrary to popular belief, no. That's impossible
Automation did not kill jobs and actually brought more trades.
Same goes to the AI world who would only kill mindless jobs and increase needed labor for energy, engineering, science, and so on.
What's more is that have you ever tried to question how a country could have a functioning economy if very few are working?

The industries need costumers. To have costumers, the people must have a job. To have a job, they must be employed by industries. If you mindlessly cut the employees, the industries would be able to save on salaries but lol.
Their profit would suffer.
No corporation would produce goods without anyone buying

That's just how society works.
Solving a problem eliminates one job but raises more and so the economy grows in complexity.

I won't say it's retarded but I sure believe that it is inaccurate

The bigger the civilization, the bigger the energy needs, that's a fact.
However, the kardashev scale believes that the civilization would have to scale their resource gathering methods in order to cope with the needs instead of just making more efficient methods of capturing energy

The Microdimensional mastery makes more sense as the smaller the field that you can master, the more efficient your system would be, the less resources you need to gather.

The idea of mastering the Earth by covering it with solar panels is absolutely stupid considering how much ecological nightmare it would cause for a miniscule energy. Just dig the Earth for geoenergy, yo

In Microdimensional mastery, we have achieved level 3 and the nuclear energy is more than enough to pave way space mining as we mine the Asteroids for valuable resources like gold that can make computers cheaper and uranium.
Always remember that asteroids have more minerals than our mines as the eons of collision already shaved away the lose dirt.

>>11462907
Not gonna happen because use your common sense, mate.
Why edit a human's genome to be dumb laborers when you could just engineer a robot for production and combat?

What you need are SPECIALIST roles that focuses on crafting those machineries and programs to create your much needed robots.

Also, produces food and clothing? For whom?
The poor cannot buy it and won't buy it because they have no money. Your business would make no profit but have to pay your taxes and bills until your company folds because you never had a costumer to start with.

Please refrain from taking inspiration from dystopian films and read something about economy.

>>11437071
Are you fucking on crack?
Blacks have infinite DENSITY
Their gravity when they were just a blue giant remains the exact same as they are now.

Probably less if the blue star went supernova and lost a whole lot of mass.