/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14792145
EA sportss

>>9355240
>in middle school, maybe. those of us who pursue higher education move beyond this. if you had actually gone to college, or even finished high school, you'd understand this.

It gets worse the higher you go.

>then why are you putting absolute faith in what others tell you about subjects that you, by your own admission, have no actual experience with?

I look at all the evidence before forming my own conclusion. Again, it's important to ask who benefits from believing what they say.

>to people who have no idea what it is, sure.

It comes down to an explosion creating everything.

>Please tell my why "How to Build a Habitable Planet", by Stephen Langmuir and Wally Broecker, is suspect. Why should I automatically distrust the authors?

Can't find much on Stephen, but Wally is part of many "fellowships" and has been awarded the 'National Medal of Science' which is awarded by the President. You only get that if you've helped the government out. Look at the medal attached, it's a man who has a physical object in one hand, but is writing an equation (in sand) with the other in a subservient manner. He's also looking at the equation rather than the physical object.

>you said that ALL equations violate the Scientific Method. you said that using math as part of science makes it nonscientific.

The scientific method cannot be applied to equations, equations don't have any physical properties.