/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10296514
>*gauge
I'm guessing you're not very intelligent. Also, verbal intelligence is but a small part of overall IQ/g-factor.

>>10287574
Richard Lynn, not Flynn.
>One of the problems with studying the controversial subject of race and IQ is we do not have reliable data on the racial IQ distributions of very many races. Richard Lynn’s 2006 book made a major contribution to the field, but analyzing hundreds of studies was too ambitious a task for a single 76-year-old man and inevitably the research was criticized for biased selection of data and clerical errors. Another problem was that different races sometimes took very different tests under wildly different circumstances and living conditions, ranging from modern industrialized society to pre-literate hunter-gathering.
Also, about IQ from an actual psychology textbook:
>See picture.
Additional reading:
>https://pumpkinperson.com/2017/04/03/a-simple-elegant-explanation-of-race-iq-differences/
>https://pumpkinperson.com/2017/05/29/better-race-and-iq-data/
The data used in the infrographic in the article above is from the National Center for Educational Stats.