/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11243744
>You are deliberately pretending they used these phrases interchangeably 60 years ago.
When did I pretend this? Can you quote me? Who says they're used interchangably today by climate scientists? Global Warming ≠ Climate Change
>The climate is always changing
And? Doesn't mean the current rapid change isn't human caused.
>That's why you can find the phrase "climate change" 60 years ago
Are you implying that humanity wasn't blasting out carbon emissions until the 50s?
>They only started calling the "anomaly" climate change recently
No, the term has been in use for decades.
>anytime it snows too much or too little, or anytime it rains too much or too little, or anytime theres too many hurricanes they call it climate change
Who does? Scientists or media pundits?
>they never care if theres too few, soooooo strange
Again who is "they"? Of course the media isn't going to mention a lack of hurricanes, media generally focuses on negative news.
>they want people to associate bad change with climate change
The current changes caused by human carbon emissions are having a negative impact on the overall climate though.
>that doesnt scare children fast enough so they want to call it climate crisis now.
The fact that you're obsessing over valid terminologies so much instead of criticising the actual science behind them leads me to believe that you don't have any actual valid criticisms of current climate science and are just spouting denier talking points.