/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9992877
Pic related

It doesn't make sense that the male of the species is larger than the female. Men don't need to be big because our reproductive organs don't need to take up a lot of room, women should be bigger because her fecundity is tied to her size. Females are larger in males in the majority of animals anyway. Now with machines and automation coming males' largeness is wholly obsolete and inefficient.

At this point, we must make the transition to a larger female mammalian species, like whales or rabbits. Optimize males to the lower bound and females to the upper bound. It would almost completely end rape and violence against women as well, and we could build a matriarchal utopia. If you're nervous about women not being attracted to small males, well if that's a social thing then they'll like the small cute males, if it is some biologically innate thing, we can engineer them to find "cuteness" attractive and like the small males. Males would be superior as well. Small size is better for modern combat, plus they take up less room and resources.

There are no downsides, the change is inevitable. Optimizing both the sexes in these roles will only make the states that do this more competitive, it's evolution.