/sci/ - Science & Math

>analytic philosophy
Into the trash.

"Logical positivism" is a poorly constructed strawtransperson. It's a silly caricature made up by pseuds who fail to cope with the metaphilosophical fact that most of philosophy is useless language games objectively failing to compete with the success and epistemological rigor of the scientific method. Calling someone a "logical positivist" is nothing more than an intellectually empty knee-jerk reaction triggered by your own cognitive dissonance when being confronted with the intellectual, aesthetic, and moral inferiority of your world view.

>>15821469
>If math is discovered instead of invented that means math is supernatural.
Sorry, but this sounds like his whole premise, and it's simply retarded.

Do idealist cucks believe in free will? Yes or no?

>>15211959
1. Epistemological hard problem of consciousness:
>What can be known about other people's qualia? Do they have qualia at all? ("Problem of other minds")
2. Linguistic hard problem of consciousness:
>How can we linguistically separate qualia from the informational contents of experience? I.e. how can we describe qualia without referring simultaneously to physical phenomena like "redness"?
3. The ontological hard problem of consciousness:
>How do qualia arise in the first place and how are they tied to the contents of experience? (related to, but not synonymous with the "binding problem")