/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12677764
Realistically, there is only room for one or two commercial space stations in the market right now considering the only use for them is millionaires dicking around. And with ISS being opened up for more commercial use that might not happen as quickly

>>12136466
What's the progress on starship this year? I haven't been following anything since last fall

real modular space station hours

>>11396954
>>11396955

Anyone know what happened to PISCES (pic)? There was only one article about it and that's all.

This is probably outside the scope of this board, but maybe you guys could benefit from some philosophy. In my opinion ontology is really the path to coping with death. I hate to say it, but there's no strictly 'scientific' route to understanding death's implications except in the sense that everything supernatural has been mostly debunked by science. So in that way we know there's no 'soul' or anything like that.

>>11112890
>Do you think it's possible to break down "memetics" into something the more intelligent people like academics and MIT grads can dominate?

Honestly, yes. The reason all attempts so far have failed is because they didn't have a sophisticated enough understanding of how it works. There is no reason to believe you couldn't quantify information spread on the internet, especially in the age of "big data" and emerging AI.

this is what NASA thinks the near future of space stations is.