[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16199995 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, DrkpKHfXgAEP1lL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16199995

if you think Uranus is blue, you should see a doctor.

>> No.15705081 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, DrkpKHfXgAEP1lL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15705081

>>15705077
depends how long you are willing to wait.

>> No.15365405 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, DrkpKHfXgAEP1lL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15365405

>>15365075
you can make better NTRs

>> No.15347494 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, 1583023207667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15347494

>>15347485
>>15347487
>muh roddit muh go back
kek, look at these assholes

>> No.14968434 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14968434

>>14968417
something like this would suffice

>> No.14599264 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, 1615757173165.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14599264

>>14598820

Pic very related.

>> No.14570808 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, liberty ship.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14570808

>>14570804
Nuclear is inevitable

>> No.12731061 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, 1583023207667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12731061

>>12731045
Keked

>> No.12559230 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12559230

>>12559219
>chemical SSTOs from Earth will always suck
FTFY

>> No.12397899 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12397899

>>12397824
The solution is simple: make Venture Star into a nuclear SSTO

>> No.12058177 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, 345665435645643.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12058177

>>12058149
>It makes no sense with something like Starship
Starship only makes sense because we've been using chemical rockets for so long. If we'd been using nuclear from the beginning we would have high-payload ssto's like pic related.

>it's hydromeme
Methane and other fuels can be swapped in for nuclear rockets as needed

>>12058149
>>12058153
fuck hippies

>> No.12026689 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12026689

>>12026686
Too small.

>> No.11840248 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840248

Gas-core atomic rockets when?

>> No.11711793 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11711793

>>11711787
>NTR is dumb for launch in any world.

>> No.11558050 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11558050

>>11558043
Cancel Orion.

Build Liberty Ships.

>> No.11429403 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11429403

>>11429388
>is there a way to select one's fuel such that there's no need to detach parts of spacecrafts as they try to escape orbit?
If I'm reading your question correctly, then yes but with lots of caveats. I don't think there are any chemical bipropellants that can do that, there might be a tripropellant combination but it would probably be so toxic and unwieldy that there would be problems supporting a rocket like that.

Outside of chemical propellants, there are possible options (pic related), but are either fissile based (and thus scares everyone) or fusion based (and thus impossible right now).

>> No.11300336 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, 1569129643058.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11300336

Let's build a nuclear rocket

>> No.11297216 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, 1569129643058.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11297216

>>11297149
NUCLEAR
LIGHT
BULB

>> No.11256130 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11256130

>>11256127
>the fuel isn't going to be flaming if it's inert

>> No.11174714 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11174714

>>11171024
Starship isn't ambitious enough.

>> No.11040994 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11040994

>launches
>property values within a hundred miles of the launchpad plummet

>> No.10992884 [View]
File: 509 KB, 1803x3456, libertyShip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10992884

>>10992848
>By necessity they'll have to build better engines than we would have to for equivalent tasks, push the gs just a bit higher and you'd see space programs only taking off once high TWR nuclear rockets have been developed.
So something like this?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]