/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14747382
Kek, I knew you'd move the goal posts back to opposition transfers, chemical propulsion has enough delta-v for both as per the presentation you posted last time which ironically sunk your argument to the point you stopped responding, presumably out of embarrassment.
>decade old NTP conjunction mission
Once again you've defeated yourself by posting (>>14747195) as an alternative which in all forms is objectively terrible. You can double down by pretending the DRACO NTP engines would completely change the architecture but they wouldn't. You are mentally ill, seek help or kill yourself.
>>14747417
>None of the proposals in that paper require 13 SLS launches
That's a flat-out lie. In some proposals the crew + cargo SLS launches would exceed 13.
>The one that uses Starships
You mean the one that uses 5 SLS, 2 New Glenn and 4 Starship launches.