/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10828988
>you used the term “self-similar” which is basically the definition of a fractal
As long as we're clear that it's your words not mine then whatever. Equate it to what you want. Speaking of "equating" how do you equate something to "the universe"?

>all “theories” in physics are described using equations
Which is part of the problem. What is there to "equate" to the universe? It's an absurd concept really.

>no, i don’t want some word salad with zero quantitative content. much less predictions. you claim to have a theory for the universe, so that means something you could calculate something with and compare to evidence. do you have that?
How can one posses the universe? Illogical. This is why you cannot understand what it is specifically. Hence there is no equation for the universe because there is nothing else to equate it to. It's an expression. It is "the universe"