Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

If you can see this message, the SSL certificate expiration has been fixed.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.11947884 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11947884

Scientifically, how high does your IQ need to be to make novel contributions to mathematics?

>> No.11685818 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, 1587168146371.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11685818

Discuss mathematics like gentleman

Previously >>11671193

>> No.11678620 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11678620

>> No.11668806 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11668806

>>11667873
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/intro-apollos-ascent/

>Moreover, progress becomes steadily harder over time; disciplines splinter (see the disappearance of polymath “Renaissance men”), and eventually, discoveries become increasingly unattainable to sole individuals (see the steady growth in numbers of paper coauthors and shared Nobel Prizes in the 20th century). In other words, these IQ discovery thresholds are themselves a function of the technological level. To make progress up the tech tree, you need to first climb up there.

>> No.11575898 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11575898

>>11575679
What is the minimum IQ required to understand Inter-universal Teichmüller theory?

>> No.11530548 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11530548

>> No.11284731 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11284731

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/intro-apollos-ascent/

>Moreover, progress becomes steadily harder over time; disciplines splinter (see the disappearance of polymath “Renaissance men”), and eventually, discoveries become increasingly unattainable to sole individuals (see the steady growth in numbers of paper coauthors and shared Nobel Prizes in the 20th century). In other words, these IQ discovery thresholds are themselves a function of the technological level. To make progress up the tech tree, you need to first climb up there.
>An extreme example today would be the work 0f Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki. At least Grigory Perelman’s proof of the Poincare Conjecture was eventually confirmed by other mathematicians after a lag of several years. But Mochizuki is so far ahead of everyone else in his particular field of Inter-universal Teichmüller theory that nobody any longer quite knows whether he is a universal genius or a lunatic.

>> No.11281445 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11281445

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/intro-apollos-ascent/

>An extreme example today would be the work 0f Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki. At least Grigory Perelman’s proof of the Poincare Conjecture was eventually confirmed by other mathematicians after a lag of several years. But Mochizuki is so far ahead of everyone else in his particular field of Inter-universal Teichmüller theory that nobody any longer quite knows whether he is a universal genius or a lunatic.

>> No.11268226 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11268226

>>11265378
Inter-Universal Teichmüller Theory

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/intro-apollos-ascent/

>> No.11192966 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11192966

>>11191323
>Is there just nothing left to discover?
No, it's just that making new discoveries requires an increasingly high IQ.

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/intro-apollos-ascent/

>Moreover, progress becomes steadily harder over time; disciplines splinter (see the disappearance of polymath “Renaissance men”), and eventually, discoveries become increasingly unattainable to sole individuals (see the steady growth in numbers of paper coauthors and shared Nobel Prizes in the 20th century). In other words, these IQ discovery thresholds are themselves a function of the technological level. To make progress up the tech tree, you need to first climb up there.
>An extreme example today would be the work 0f Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki. At least Grigory Perelman’s proof of the Poincare Conjecture was eventually confirmed by other mathematicians after a lag of several years. But Mochizuki is so far ahead of everyone else in his particular field of Inter-universal Teichmüller theory that nobody any longer quite knows whether he is a universal genius or a lunatic.

>> No.11016577 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11016577

>>11016564
Pic related

>> No.10974361 [View]
File: 42 KB, 762x353, math IQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10974361

>>10974279
Pic related

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/intro-apollos-ascent/



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]