/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11368557
>not proven to be evolution
Says who? By who?
Adaptation in the way of natural selection and random mutations is evolution. You just don't know what evolution actually is.
Give me a definition of evolution.
>faked research
You have no source for this.
>races of dogs
>not evolution
Organisms changing their form in the way of any kind of selection and having random mutations are undergoing evolution process.
In this case instead of natural selection, you have artificial selection.
Anyway its not human who creates traits of animals, human just picks them, but traits have its beginning in random mutations.
Still, you don't know what evolution actually is.
>The fossil record has been unable to prove Darwin's theory of gradual change and increasing complexity.
That's not true. There are types of organisms only found in rock layers from certain era. As we go up with the layers, the complexity of fossils you find is increasing. You can't find fossils of humans form Mesozoic, because there were no humans yet, on the other hand you can find dinosaurs, and fossils of early birds, which evolved from dinosaurs. Why can't you find dinosaurs living today?
There are eras where you can barely find anything, because of mass extinctions, yet millions years later life is blooming again and organisms are similar versions of those who survived.
What's your explanation for this? Or are rock layers also faked research?
>The theory is dead
More like education system of your country.

In conclusion:
You lack basic biological and geological knowledge and think every research that do not support your arguments is fake, although you have no real evidence, only youtube videos made by people who are not even related to biology, are not biologists.
Read Darwin's book "On the origin of species", read the basics of genetics and geology, then come back and we can talk.