/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12710140
> you're being held to your own standards while they just do whatever they want and ignore the rules
there are no universal rules of morality when it comes to this topic, what is considered acceptable varies wildly, depending on which ethnicity and social caste is questioned
>seeing what they did with the riots
a specific case of some extremists acting out, something that appears repeatedly in the scope of history
there is not much to derive from this incident that isnt already obvious
>No one will even consider this study
i do not think so, i think that if presented properly and throughout that even the average person who might be irritated when reading the title will not be immune to the voice of reason
>they will cancel every single person involved before it even reaches the mainstream
cancelling people is one thing, still the idea lives on
same thing with watson, he got cancelled for stating the truth
similar thing happened to the german prime minister who said that the war in the middle east is fought out of economic interest
everyone knows that they are true, and the average person seeing the article and reading the story will come to that exact conclusion unless they are already heavily ideologically predisposed
>the mainstream media
is hardly credible and the average populous is well aware of their shortcomings and when they are blatantly euphemizing and framing
>a petition signed by 5000 academics urging them to retract their paper
and the number could be six million and the critical thinker would still be able to see past it

>>11598368
>>11598368
>physicists do not need to be logical positivists
That's false. Faggot. The reason is because Physicists are ALL positivists, ALL OF THEM. That means that they define their terms by observations. Positivism is ESSENTIAL for physics.
>what the fuck are you talking about. Why would you think this?
The philosophy started in physics, with Mach and Carnap (who was trained in physics), and it cannot die in physics, because it is essential for understanding physics, at least past 1900. Relativity, quantum mechanics, string theory, holography, that's all positivism. That means that "God created the universe" is fundamentally meaningless, it is not wrong, it is not right, it is, in Pauli's phrase "not even wrong". It doesn't rise to the level of a meaningful utterance. If you have idea X and idea Y, and the two ideas are the same regarding all sense impressions, then they are the same idea. That's positivism, son. That's what we got here.

I'm really glad you're back.

What I wonder is why you imply "improving the world for everyone" would be a desirable investment.

>>7149724
It doesn't matter anymore. Maybe it would have been bad 5 years ago, but today 4chan is amongst the top 200 visited websites worldwide and the only difference to reddit is that the audience is younger and there are less rules.

>between the age of 18 and 25
Age will not matter once we claim immortality
>play video games and I'm here to play
Life's a game
>think you're above average intelligence or very intelligent
If I look at the people around me, on facebook and the streets --- they are sheep.
>an underachiever
I'm the constructive limit
>never live up to your full potential
Potentials are only defined up to gauge transformations, so this question is nonsensical
>antisocial
Look at me. I smoke cigs and fuck sluts all week
>don't really understand science or math but wish you did
I mastered logic by the age of 12.

Our savior has done it again :3

not everyone is an emotionless genius like lenardo

>>7029978
>implying geniuses have emotions
don't worry I still fuck sluts and smoke cigs like an normal teenager

>>6972052
>>6972036
>>6972035
>>6972034
>>6972027
>>6972026
>>6972017
>>6972002
>0
>>6971998
>>6971981
>>6971969
>>6971937
Shane here, ask me anything. hurry up im playing a game.

HIS LORD RETURNS
BOW DOWN PLEBEIANS
YOUR DAMSELS ARE FORFEIT