/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15265287
If you buy something for $X and sell it at $(X+10), you made $10. If you do it twice, you make $20.

dimensions higher than 3d don't exist. gravity wells are not a dimension.

>>15128831
>Even if society collapsed and especially if society collapsed, all the scientists would be gathered in a safe facility and plug away at unlocking the holy grail until they succeed.
They actually believe shit like this. Anyway, your repeated refusal to answer the question doesn't help your case. You're heavily invested in a system of oppression because you think your rulers are going to make you immortal if you defend it, so why did you chimp out so violently when the other anon pointed this out?

>It's so crazy to me that we're having this conversation right here, and you're still trying to deny that 4chan isn't an echo chamber
You just can't make this shit up.

>>14833829
There is no such thing as "AI art".

>ITT: AGW hysteria bugmen vs. corporate-worshipping consoomerist bugmen

>phd thesis advisor suddenly went to fight in ukraine

Daily reminder that 9/10 consciousness posters have no consciousness no matter what braindead 19th position they're arguing for.

>>14704372
>we WILL return samples from Mars
Wow that's so heckin' amazing!

>>14701047
>Is this a correlation?
Yes.

>Could you infer that one may cause the other?
No. It all comes down to IQ. Higher IQ means higher quality of life and higher life expectancy. Higher IQ also means the most efficient method of population control is engineering of consent instead of raw enforcement. There is no such thing as a democracy.

>>14673522
>It's time we had a discussion about what consciousness really is from a purely logical perspective
You sure are fucking stupid.

>>14524752
>All styles are possible from dall-e-2
Uh huh, so long as you have a huge dataset of examples of human drawings it can learn to mimic in a half-asse dmanner.

>>14522723
>NPC’s don’t even realize they’re NPC’s
So it seems. Now please tell me more about how science proves that there is on meaningful distinction between you and a rock. It's very enlightening. :^)

>>14490537
Deep Learning by Ian Goodfellow is okay and covers the basics at least. If nothing else, at least you'll learn why X times more parameters doesn't equal X times more computing power, and why the specifics of the architecture can drastically reduce (or increase) the number of parameters needed to approximate a function.

>>10731763
If you think people are regularly implying racism, sexism, etc. in normal conversation you're just schizophrenic or something

>considering biology a brainlet science
>ignoring the fact that biophysics and biochemistry are just those disciplines relevant to life sciences

>>10473960
>it's another order-of-operations thread

>watching linear algebra lecture
>it's boring as fuck

>watching linear algebra lectures
>it's boring as fuck

>not math(s)

>not well-defined

>>>(insert general or board)

Why are mathematicians so bad at banter

/pol/ subhumans needs to leave

meanwhile on a board about science

>>9725547
>>9725564
>>>/v/
>>9725556
>>>/d/
>>9726035
>>9726292
>>9726359
>>>/lit/
>>>/x/
>>9726371
>>>/int/

>Math-based non-science class
>Yet another fucking lesson on the normal distribution
When does it end lads

Are computer science students to mathematicians like engineers are to physicists? Most of them seem like massive faggots to me