/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11245330

>>11245139
I know? But imagine not doing the fractional distillation yourself, you lazy scrotum.

>>11245002
You really want to start on ME? Bad choice.
First of all, "very small" relative to what?
Second of all, "growing in size", relative to what?
The only thing you got right was expansion is increasing.
If you knew anything, you would know that everything has been in the same place since the "start", literally:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law

>Basically the universe was very small, and then it started to literally grow in size. And the speed of growth is increasing.
Impressive, did you quote that from your PhD?

>>11244755
Imagine being okay with being this dumb, it's a sad world.

>>11244390
>Is your reading comprehension that poor anon?
Lmao, you want to start on ME? I'd rhetorically CRUSH you. I really wouldn't advise that.
>why are you picking a fight with me?
Anyway, now that we've got that unpleasantness out of the way, I am merely saying this whole thread is based upon "nothing". The argument you are having right now, would be best taken elsewhere, either to another thread, or perhaps an alternative service, like IRC.
So please, do not bump this junk thread, with junk science, it may spread disinformation.
Thank you.

>>10769204
>rapport