/sci/ - Science & Math

follow the money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_Foundation

https://youtu.be/e4hiSgiGloo
https://youtu.be/72DA4fgamPE
https://youtu.be/5K_4b-I1snM
https://youtu.be/Xm_6Gi4Jqbg

copenhagen interpretation is cope

https://youtu.be/2LtT3sfbSXs
https://youtu.be/1-_IRbu1gAo
https://youtu.be/Hopd-gKB1Xc
https://youtu.be/r0plv_nIzsQ
https://youtu.be/rbRVnC92sMs

there can be no evidence for probabilistic characteristics of reality as in either deterministic or probabilistic universes the classical interpretation of the uncertainty principle is the limit of measurement. I.e it is always a lie to attribute an experimental result to probabilism before measurement error unless you wield a measuring device of infinite accuracy

whether we are in a probabilistic universe or deterministic universe it is impossible to run an experiment that can justify belief in probabilistic characteristics of the universe because we do not have an infinitely accurate measuring device.

>>11488206
I don't think that, there is no experiment you can run that makes it justifiable to believe what has been happening will continue to happen. That is not the purpose of science, science is about prediction. Precisely why is it is insane to believe in probabilism

>>11488209
your shill non arguments are obvious. I can't believe you retards think this is gonna work

there can be no evidence for probabilistic characteristics of reality as in either deterministic or probabilistic universes the classical interpretation of the uncertainty principle is the limit of measurement. I.e it is always a lie to attribute an experimental result to probabilism before measurement error unless you wield a measuring device outside of our reality

>>11024567
the only cope is the Copenhagen interpretation.

it is the opposite of science; Creating models that justify a belief not justified by experiment.

>>10969284
can't spell copenhagen without cope.