/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11907175
You are not even Human any more
You have no soul and are not even truly alive

It's important to understand that in order to make people superfluous, machines will not have to surpass them in general intelligence but only in certain specialized kinds of intelligence. For example, the machines will not have to create or understand art, music, or literature, they will not need the ability to carry on an intelligent, non-technical conversation (the "Turing test"), they will not have to exercise tact or understand human nature, because these skills will have no application if humans are to be eliminated anyway. To make humans superfluous, the machines will only need to outperform them in making the technical decisions that have to be made for the purpose of promoting the short-term survival and propagation of the dominant self-prop systems. So, even without going as far as the techies themselves do in assuming intelligence on the part of future machines, we still have to conclude that humans will become obsolete. Immortality in the form (i)-the indefinite preservation of the human body as it exits today-is highly improbable.

The techies of course will argue that even if the human body and brain as we know them become obsolete, immortality in the form (ii) can still be achieved: Man-machine hybrids will permanently retain their usefulness, because by linking themselves with ever-more-powerful machines human beings (or what is left of them) will be able to remain competitive with pure machines.

>>11493656

I'm an Anarcho-Monarchist but neutral on whether I prefer primitivism or transhumanism despite pic related. I would like to experience a past society even if a brutal lifestyle compared to today, but not sure if I'd want to go completely cavemode. On the other hand technology has made life much simpler for the average person, but I would not want to live life on easy mode where a robot appendage might complete everything for me and I have no troubles