/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11448254
>Bullshit. No physical model requires consciousness, so how can it be fundamental?
No physical model accounts for it, so they don't hold much weight.

>So test your imagination vs. what appears real and see which one wins. Hint: your imagination won't do shit.
>Then you won't mind if I bash your brains in, right? It's only physical substance.
pic related

>How would something fundamental require a host or facilitation of its own creation? Show me consciousness without a host.
Humans create video games and need a ui to experience them.

>God of the gaps fallacy. You claim to know something yet your only argument is based on ignorance.
God of the gaps is valid when the gaps are as big as they are, and the original argument explicitly states that it's based on what we know.

>>11198489
>Invent a word for people who disagree with you
>slander people who disagree with you by calling them that word
>now you can't be wrong
fucking genius

>>11115051
> Bashi or Bashir is not Pasteur no matter how much you handwave.

This can be applied to literally any pronunciation of any name in any language other than the owner of the name's natuve language

>>10977932
>same position

>>10885680
>We
normies can't handle my army of /b/ros!