/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12738154
>>12738172
>Ad hominem, if there is anything childish is you using pictures of anime girls lmao
How is calling the argument itself childish an ad hominem? Learn what ad hominem means pls.

>The supreme source of all creation, yes I think that's God, there's no better definition.
It's an illogical thought experiment with many issues (as explained above) and you giving the name of God to a mecanicist view of the universe is not scientific evidence.

>AHAHAHAHA, God is proposed as the source, there is no thing as the cause of the ultimate source itself.
And what's the proof of this being true?
It's literally an idea, it's not based on anything.

>Then I guess electromagnetism and gravity are pointless theories to believe in just because they have infinite range and we'll never known to full extent just what gravity and electromagnetism are.
No, we have evidence these forces exist, we can confirm their existence through experimentation, we don't have any evidence "God" exists.

>Yes, the principle of causality is scientific, since all of physics is based upon it.
The Principle of Causality does not mean what you think it means, you were corrected yet you insist upon this mistake.

>Nope it is not, quantum gravity refutes this garbage assumption, quantum gravity is incompatible with GR and current QM.
Please explain how it refutes the paper I have just cited to you.

>I do what I want
So you do care.

>Sure like the one above.
One dictionary of etimologies provided by you, versus three modern definitions from reputable dictionaries (Oxford, Merriam-Webster, etc) provided by me


>according to modern academia the word "religion" has no consensus on its meaning
So? This doesn't mean you can define it however you want in your mental gymnastics

>You are most likely a bad person anyway, is the truth.
See? This is an actual ad hominem you dumb hypocrite.

>>12738154
>Ad hominem, if there is anything childish is you using pictures of anime girls lmao
How is calling the argument itself childish an ad hominem? Learn what ad hominem means pls.

>The supreme source of all creation, yes I think that's God, there's no better definition.
It's an illogical thought experiment with many issues (as explained above) and you giving the name of God to a mecanicist view of the universe is not scientific evidence.

>AHAHAHAHA, God is proposed as the source, there is no thing as the cause of the ultimate source itself.
And what's the proof of this being true?
It's literally an idea, it's not based on anything.

>Then I guess electromagnetism and gravity are pointless theories to believe in just because they have infinite range and we'll never known to full extent just what gravity and electromagnetism are.
No, we have evidence these forces exist, we can confirm their existence through experimentation, we don't have any evidence "God" exists.

>Yes, the principle of causality is scientific, since all of physics is based upon it.
The Principle of Causality does not mean what you think it means, you were corrected yet you insist upon this mistake.

>Nope it is not, quantum gravity refutes this garbage assumption, quantum gravity is incompatible with GR and current QM.
Please explain how QR refutes the paper I have just cited to you.

>I do what I want
So you do care.

>Sure like the one above.
One dictionary of etimologies provided by you, versus three modern definitions from reputable dictionaries (Oxford, Merriam-Webster, etc) provided by me


>according to modern academia the word "religion" has no consensus on its meaning
So? This doesn't mean you can define it however you want in your mental gymnastics

>You are most likely a bad person anyway, is the truth.
See? This is an actual ad hominem you dumb hypocrite.

>>12058058
More than 80% of the infected remain undetected.

Real death rate is between 0.19% and 0.29%.
It's basically a flu. This will go down as the largest case of mass hysteria in world history.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/12/554/eabc1126

does getting into a prestigious school matter? or is it the same whether i graduate from shitterfield university or harvard

>>11926690
I'm not sure if Bonobo-Chimp hybrids are fertile.
Might have to look that up since now you've made me curious too.

Also ligers are the cutest hybrid bois.

extremely easy to find a job anywhere, high pay and people will respect you but it's very long and it is the most difficult field to get into.
it took everything for me to get into it and after 6 years of studying i have to endure years of internship just to be allowed to tell some old hag to take ibuprofen or prescribe some beta blocker to some other old hag if i waste extra years specializing in cardiology