[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10828776 [View]
File: 63 KB, 600x600, 1563660964019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10828776

What do I have if I have a group but without the existence of an inverse. My identity element is still unique.

>> No.10452461 [View]
File: 63 KB, 600x600, when someone says god is real.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10452461

>>10452131
>basically all of the people you listed besides newton and descartes were not religious. not even planck was any sort of traditional religion
Einstein certainly was, do your research properly redditard

>> No.9466305 [View]
File: 56 KB, 600x600, when someone says god is real.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9466305

>>9465156
>>9465173
There's no such thing as a single method that leads to the obtainment of knowledge about reality. Actual, relevant discoveries in science (think something that radically changes our understanding of reality, not the shit done by PhDs with fund money) are rarely made by following your stale "methods", but usually quite the contrary: by going against the dominant views.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions#Basic_approach
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemological_anarchism

Of course, given your evident and utter ignorance understanding of philosophy of science and your belief that what you're taught in elementary school is all there is to it (!!!), I don't believe either of you would've thought of this.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]