/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9753669
>Of course there's lens distortion, it's always going to occur due to them being curved.
in the last thread, I posted this video:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOsxgGeABGM
and you insisted that there must be distortion making a flat horizon appear curved, despite the fact that the pan over the instrument panel (and the complete lack of distortion in its shape) shows there is no detectable distortion in the footage. you claim it's impossible to make a lens that doesn't distort the image, and yet you've been shown over and over again that it has already been done.
flatheads will deny the evidence right in front of their eyes in order to cling desperately to their sad little delusion.

>>9753669
>How about testing this non-constant constant
Read: >>9753639
>with other materials? Do it at a much larger scale for easier measurement.
Why would the material the wires are made out of affect the measured attractive force?
You STILL can't explain why the experiment consistently returns the same value for G (to within ONE PERCENT) no matter what setup is used.
>This shitty experiment hasn't proven anything.
just saying so doesn't make it true, you pissbaby.

Could a computer's headphone jack alone be capable of transmitting a modulated radio signal such as AM and FM?