/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11347798
The belief that a runable program can be sentient is equivalent to electrons firing in just such a way in a particular permutation can be sentient. To assume this is possible is a reduction fallacy. Inductively, we know this isn't possible, because no permutation has produced consciousness. nor is there evidence that they ever will produce anything more than a thing that may act and not be, conscious. Even irl proponents of strong ai recognize this error in reasoning, and so now claim that until circuit boards are close to as complex as the brain, strong ai will not be possible.
>>11347816
That thing is female or I am violated.
#metoo

>>11309852
>>11309854
>>11309860