/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11458085
>not empirical
energy always manifests itself as weight on a scale, you put any energy on a scale, and it weighs.
>not observable or falsable
energy always manifests itself as weight on a scale, you put any energy on a scale, and it weighs.

>>11448301
>I do not understand how this conclusion was reached:\sin{10 ^{\circ}} = 10 * 2\pi/ 360
First notice that in [math]\color{#781b86}{\tt{r}}\color{#3e5dcf}{\tt{a}}\color{#7ab77a}{\tt{d}}\color{#b1bd4d}{\tt{i}}\color{#b1bd4d}{\tt{a}}\color{#dea63b}{\tt{n}}\color{#da2121}{\tt{s}}[/math] [math] \sin{dx} = dx [/math] for infinitesimal [math] dx ~ [/math]("numbers very close to the value of x when the value of x is zero")
Once you've understood that part, we can use the formula for any [math] dx [/math] values that reasonably satisfy our definition: "values very close to the value of x when the value of x is zero"
Since our formula is for radians, and because there are [math] 2\pi [/math] radians for every [math] 360 [/math] degrees, we can still use degrees as [math] dx [/math] values as long as the equivalent value in radians satisfy our definition: "values very close to the value of x when the value of x is zero" We expect that [math] 10 * 2\pi/ 360 [/math] will be very close to the value of zero, so we can apply the formula to approximate its value, we just have to make sure our [math] dx [/math] value is expressed in radians: [math] 10 * 2\pi/ 360 [/math] and so we use [math] \sin{10 ^{\circ}} = 10 * 2\pi/ 360 [/math]
>Next, how can you say that these are equal?: x(t +dt) = x(t) + v(t) dt
This is the same idea expressed in the first example >>11448239

E + pi = i + 1 + 0 is the most beautiful math equation in history, which has far reaching applications in quantum consciousness teleportation and quantum skeletons. Despite being so simple, it took Gauss 40 years to prove, and it still isn't completely proven yet.