/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12125291
I wish I was as optimist as you.
Nothing in the way the world is evolving suggest people sharing wealth and not seeking a competitive advantage over any other being alive.
We worship capitalism and self-called "elites" who only happen to inherit or win the Wall Street lottery, the rich refuse to share wealth as long as they can argue it's not their fault if other of the world are poor (it totally is).

Even if I don't share the silly "bad genes" of that other anon, as soon as we get robot that replace the poor people we will engage in a guilt-free economic genocide and whoever own theses robots (building other robots) will consider them their righteous property.

As we develop AIs we will NOT give up control for obvious reasons and as we are already doing now they'll be used to shape both the world and the infosphere to suit whoever control them.
And we the way we are so easily manipulated into depowering any democratic government, the only organization on which you truly have any kind of power left. There will be no organization left to enforce laws against a plutocrat class.

As simplistic as the plot of Elysium was, it alas depict a likely future.

>>12125418
>>12125432
People like you make a dystopia even more likely. While I unfortunately agree on many of your point, your uneducated insistence that it's a matter of "genetic superiority" show how people can be easily tricked by misunderstood ideas into behaving into a predetermined mindset.
To clarify:
All criterias for this "superiority" will be arbitrary, even a therapy for eternal life will require many other side aspect like wether or not it include eternal youth or how it manage the brain and memories.
We do not have yet a process to truly grade intelligence and the little we have don't care if you are a sociopath who want to kill everyone or a good Samaritan.